Radeon Pro W6400 vs Pro WX 7100

Place in performance ranking	255	251
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.50	68.33
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	Navi 24
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data
Current price	$582 (0.7x MSRP)	$206

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W6400 has 551% better value for money than Pro WX 7100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	768
Boost clock speed	1243 MHz	2331 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	179.0	111.9
Floating-point performance	5,728 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 7100 20.39

Pro W6400 20.56
+0.8%

Pro W6400 outperforms Pro WX 7100 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 7100 7891

Pro W6400 7955
+0.8%

Pro W6400 outperforms Pro WX 7100 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+6.7%

30−33

−6.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +2.5%	40−45 −2.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Hitman 3	55−60 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +2.5%	40−45 −2.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Hitman 3	55−60 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +2.5%	40−45 −2.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Hitman 3	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +2.5%	40−45 −2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Hitman 3	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.39	20.56
Recency	1 March 2017	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	50 Watt