Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500X Radeon Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700X
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5700 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5700
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 205 Watt
33.16
+327%

Pro W5700 outperforms T500 Mobile by a whopping 327% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro W5700 Pro W5700
T500 Mobile Quadro T500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking133501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.33no data
Power efficiency12.8334.20
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date19 November 2019 (5 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304896
Core clock speed1243 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate277.994.92
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+317%
36
−317%
1440p60−65
+300%
15
−300%
4K70−75
+312%
17
−312%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.33no data
1440p13.32no data
4K11.41no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Pro W5700 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Pro W5700 is 317% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W5700 is 300% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W5700 is 312% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 33.16 7.76
Recency 19 November 2019 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 18 Watt

Pro W5700 has a 327.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1038.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
vs
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
vs
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
RTX A4000H NVIDIA RTX A4000H
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
Graphics 512SP Mobile AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
vs
RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 Super
RTX 3000 X2 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
Arc 8-Core iGPU Intel Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
RX 7900 XTX AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 685
GeForce 610M NVIDIA GeForce 610M
vs
RX 5500 XT RX 5500 XT
FX 5700 EP NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 EP
vs
RX 5500 XT RX 5500 XT
Arc 8-Core iGPU Intel Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
RX 5600 XT RX 5600 XT
3dfx Voodoo5 5500 AGP
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
RTX A500 NVIDIA RTX A500
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 96 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 111 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5700 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.