Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Quadro P2200

#ad 
Buy Quadro P2200
P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 P6000
VS
7-Core iGPU 7-Cores iGPU 8-Core iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2200 with Arc 8-Core iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P2200
2019
5 GB GDDR5X, 75 Watt
22.21
+32.4%

P2200 outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking250323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.10no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGP106Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 June 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12808
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1493 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate119.4no data
Floating-point processing power3.822 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5Xno data
Maximum RAM amount5 GBno data
Memory bus width160 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1251 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth200.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+28.6%
35
−28.6%
1440p21−24
+23.5%
17
−23.5%
4K18−20
+28.6%
14
−28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 26
+0%
26
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+0%
19
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16
+0%
16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Quadro P2200 and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2200 is 29% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2200 is 24% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P2200 is 29% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 22.21 16.78
Recency 10 June 2019 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm

Quadro P2200 has a 32.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 8-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2200 is a workstation card while Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
vs
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile RTX 4000 Mobile
RTX A4000 Max-Q RTX A4000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
RTX A4000H RTX A4000H
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
Graphics 512SP Mobile Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
vs
RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 Super
RTX 3000 X2 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 685
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5700 Pro W5700
GeForce 610M GeForce 610M
vs
RX 5500 XT RX 5500 XT
FX 5700 EP GeForce FX 5700 EP
vs
RX 5500 XT RX 5500 XT
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
RX 5600 XT RX 5600 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 419 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 76 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2200 or Arc 8-Core iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.