Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Pro Vega II

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega II with Radeon RX 6600 XT, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega II
2019
32 GB HBM2, 475 Watt
40.39

RX 6600 XT outperforms Pro Vega II by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9378
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.60
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2021)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameVega 20Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)30 July 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 $379
Current price$9999 (4.5x MSRP)$283 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega II and RX 6600 XT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Core clock speed1574 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Watt160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate440.3331.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
WidthQuad-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1612 MBps16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth825.3 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega II 40.39
RX 6600 XT 42.70
+5.7%

RX 6600 XT outperforms Pro Vega II by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega II 15596
RX 6600 XT 16489
+5.7%

RX 6600 XT outperforms Pro Vega II by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
−6.7%
128
+6.7%
1440p70−75
−7.1%
75
+7.1%
4K35−40
−17.1%
41
+17.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−12.9%
79
+12.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−13.8%
70−75
+13.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−7.5%
129
+7.5%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−14.2%
130−140
+14.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−7.5%
85−90
+7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−11.4%
78
+11.4%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−7.1%
90−95
+7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−10.5%
100−110
+10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−12.9%
150−160
+12.9%
Hitman 3 100−105
−8%
108
+8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 270−280
−7%
289
+7%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−7.3%
110−120
+7.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 240−250
−7.1%
257
+7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−9.1%
120
+9.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−13.8%
70−75
+13.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
−6%
106
+6%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−14.2%
130−140
+14.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−7.5%
85−90
+7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−8.6%
76
+8.6%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−7.1%
90−95
+7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−10.5%
100−110
+10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−12.9%
150−160
+12.9%
Hitman 3 85−90
−10.6%
94
+10.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−8.8%
170−180
+8.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−6.7%
64
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190−200
−10%
209
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
−10%
176
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−7.4%
100−110
+7.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−13.8%
70−75
+13.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
−7.1%
75
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−7.5%
85−90
+7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−6.2%
69
+6.2%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−7.1%
90−95
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−12.9%
150−160
+12.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−12.1%
157
+12.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
−7.6%
183
+7.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
−10%
99
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−10.9%
61
+10.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−10.7%
80−85
+10.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−17.5%
45−50
+17.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
−12%
56
+12%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−10%
65−70
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−14.3%
40
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−10.5%
105
+10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−5.9%
90−95
+5.9%
Hitman 3 60−65
−11.7%
67
+11.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
−16%
116
+16%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−8.9%
98
+8.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−7.3%
118
+7.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−6.7%
60−65
+6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−10%
44
+10%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−13.8%
70−75
+13.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−7.5%
40−45
+7.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−23.3%
35−40
+23.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
−10%
33
+10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−14.3%
40
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−8%
54
+8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−16.7%
28
+16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−19%
24−27
+19%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−10%
66
+10%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−6%
53
+6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−14.3%
24
+14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−11.4%
35−40
+11.4%

This is how Pro Vega II and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 7% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.39 42.70
Recency 3 June 2019 30 July 2021
Cost $2199 $379
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 475 Watt 160 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro Vega II and Radeon RX 6600 XT.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 80 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3874 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.