ATI Radeon X1650 vs RX 5600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600 XT and Radeon X1650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5600 XT
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
33.92
+18744%

RX 5600 XT outperforms ATI X1650 by a whopping 18744% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1441403
Place by popularity80not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.92no data
Power efficiency16.19no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 10RV516
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 January 2020 (5 years ago)20 November 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1130 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate224.62.540
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB256 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz392 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s6.272 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 33.92
+18744%
ATI X1650 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600 XT 13555
+18992%
ATI X1650 71

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1080−1
1440p62-0−1
4K36-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.58no data
1440p4.50no data
4K7.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 77 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 83 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 63 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 69 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 190
+18900%
1−2
−18900%
Forza Horizon 5 121 0−1
Metro Exodus 139 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 112 0−1
Valorant 179 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 53 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 59 0−1
Dota 2 146 0−1
Far Cry 5 66 0−1
Fortnite 160−170 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 158 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 91 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 126 0−1
Metro Exodus 94 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+19000%
1−2
−19000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 53 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130 0−1
Valorant 87 0−1
World of Tanks 270−280
+27700%
1−2
−27700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 47 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 50 0−1
Dota 2 168 0−1
Far Cry 5 90−95 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 141 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 85 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+19000%
1−2
−19000%
Valorant 148 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 61 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 61 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 35 0−1
World of Tanks 220−230
+22400%
1−2
−22400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 29 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 97 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 59 0−1
Metro Exodus 88 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 0−1
Valorant 97 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 19 0−1
Dota 2 63 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 63 0−1
Metro Exodus 30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 23 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12 0−1
Dota 2 99 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Fortnite 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 57 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30 0−1
Valorant 38 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.92 0.18
Recency 21 January 2020 20 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 80 nm

RX 5600 XT has a 18744.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
ATI Radeon X1650
Radeon X1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2951 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.