Radeon HD 8760 OEM vs Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking202not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.50no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Cape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)8 January 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096640
Core clock speed1250 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate345.640.00
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS1.28 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs25640
L1 Cache1 MB160 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm210 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 8 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

Pro Vega 64 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8760 OEM, on the other hand, has 213% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon HD 8760 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8760 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8760 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Radeon HD 8760 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.