GeForce GTX 750 v2 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking196not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.25no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVega 10GM206
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)17 November 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096512
Core clock speed1250 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1188 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate345.638.02
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS1.217 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 17 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Pro Vega 64 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 750 v2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 750 v2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
GeForce GTX 750 v2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 65 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or GeForce GTX 750 v2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.