GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 64
Aggregated performance score
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 64 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 148 | 113 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 82 |
| Value for money | 1.99 | 32.33 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Vega 10 | Pascal GP104 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 June 2017 (6 years old) | 2 November 2017 (6 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $399 |
| Current price | $6074 | $231 (0.6x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX 1070 Ti has 1525% better value for money than Pro Vega 64.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 2432 |
| Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 345.6 | 255.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | 8,186 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 256.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 6.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 64 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 64 by 13% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
Radeon Pro Vega 64 outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Ti by 39% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Radeon Pro Vega 64 outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 Ti by 22% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 95−100
−16.8%
| 111
+16.8%
|
| 1440p | 60−65
−20%
| 72
+20%
|
| 4K | 45−50
−20%
| 54
+20%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 33.52 | 37.91 |
| Recency | 27 June 2017 | 2 November 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 180 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 64 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
