UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

Place in the ranking	376	828
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.58	25.09
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Vega 12	Lakefield GT2
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	14 November 2018 (6 years ago)	28 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	64
Core clock speed	815 MHz	200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1283 MHz	500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	7 Watt
Texture fill rate	102.6	no data
Floating-point processing power	3.284 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	80	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	740 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	189.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.3	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 20 13.74
+445%

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 2.52

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro Vega 20 12289
+586%

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 1792

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro Vega 20 9044
+598%

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 1296

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro Vega 20 62318
+641%

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 8409

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro Vega 20 278586
+217%

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 87818

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	57 +338%	13 −338%
4K	41 +486%	7−8 −486%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24
+320%

5−6

−320%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +300%	8−9 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	0−1
Battlefield 5	40−45 +1367%	3−4 −1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +367%	6−7 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Far Cry New Dawn	51 +629%	7−8 −629%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +650%	12−14 −650%
Hitman 3	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +255%	20−22 −255%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +533%	6−7 −533%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	76 +591%	10−12 −591%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +100%	35−40 −100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +300%	8−9 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	0−1
Battlefield 5	40−45 +1367%	3−4 −1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +367%	6−7 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +557%	7−8 −557%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +650%	12−14 −650%
Hitman 3	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +255%	20−22 −255%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +533%	6−7 −533%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +309%	10−12 −309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +154%	12−14 −154%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +100%	35−40 −100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +300%	8−9 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +367%	6−7 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +650%	12−14 −650%
Hitman 3	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +255%	20−22 −255%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +309%	10−12 −309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 +138%	12−14 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +100%	35−40 −100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+533%

6−7

−533%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +575%	4−5 −575%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +483%	12−14 −483%
Hitman 3	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +467%	14−16 −467%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+267%

6−7

−267%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Hitman 3	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +458%	12−14 −458%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+200%

4−5

−200%

This is how Pro Vega 20 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compete in popular games:

Pro Vega 20 is 338% faster in 1080p
Pro Vega 20 is 486% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro Vega 20 is 2200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro Vega 20 surpassed UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.74	2.52
Recency	14 November 2018	28 May 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	7 Watt

Pro Vega 20 has a 445.2% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1328.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.