Radeon RX 5500M vs TITAN V CEO Edition

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V CEO Edition with Radeon RX 5500M, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V CEO Edition
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.20
+202%

TITAN V CEO Edition outperforms RX 5500M by a whopping 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking84360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.1911.86
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 June 2018 (6 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201408
Core clock speed1200 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6144.8
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs32088
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V CEO Edition 44.20
+202%
RX 5500M 14.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V CEO Edition 16987
+202%
RX 5500M 5619

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD170−180
+193%
58
−193%
1440p190−200
+202%
63
−202%
4K90−95
+200%
30
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55
+0%
55
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 108
+0%
108
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Dota 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 88
+0%
88
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 57
+0%
57
+0%
World of Tanks 191
+0%
191
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Dota 2 103
+0%
103
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+0%
72
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 175
+0%
175
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
World of Tanks 137
+0%
137
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+0%
8
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20
+0%
20
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 72
+0%
72
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
World of Tanks 76
+0%
76
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+0%
3
+0%
Dota 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how TITAN V CEO Edition and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 193% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 202% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 200% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.20 14.62
Recency 21 June 2018 7 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 85 Watt

TITAN V CEO Edition has a 202.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 194.1% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V CEO Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5500M in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V CEO Edition is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 353 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.