Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro Vega 20
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 20 with Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.
Pro 20 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Graphics G7 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 435 | 509 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 9.49 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Vega 12 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 November 2018 (7 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 815 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1283 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 102.6 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.284 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | no data |
| TMUs | 80 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 740 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 189.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 61
+35.6%
| 45−50
−35.6%
|
| 4K | 41
+36.7%
| 30−35
−36.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+40%
|
50−55
−40%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+44.4%
|
18−20
−44.4%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 74
+80.5%
|
40−45
−80.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+40%
|
50−55
−40%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+44.4%
|
18−20
−44.4%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+34.2%
|
35−40
−34.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40
+33.3%
|
30−33
−33.3%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
+30.4%
|
55−60
−30.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+29.3%
|
40−45
−29.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40
+44.4%
|
27−30
−44.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+35.3%
|
30−35
−35.3%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+20.9%
|
90−95
−20.9%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 63
+53.7%
|
40−45
−53.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+40%
|
50−55
−40%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 170−180
+23.8%
|
140−150
−23.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+44.4%
|
18−20
−44.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 85
+25%
|
65−70
−25%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+34.2%
|
35−40
−34.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 37
+23.3%
|
30−33
−23.3%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
+30.4%
|
55−60
−30.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+29.3%
|
40−45
−29.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40
+44.4%
|
27−30
−44.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 45−50
+34.3%
|
35−40
−34.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+36.8%
|
18−20
−36.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+35.3%
|
30−35
−35.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50
+108%
|
24−27
−108%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+20.9%
|
90−95
−20.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60
+46.3%
|
40−45
−46.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+44.4%
|
18−20
−44.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 78
+14.7%
|
65−70
−14.7%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+34.2%
|
35−40
−34.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 37
+23.3%
|
30−33
−23.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+29.3%
|
40−45
−29.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+35.3%
|
30−35
−35.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 31
+29.2%
|
24−27
−29.2%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+37.5%
|
80−85
−37.5%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 70−75
+30.4%
|
55−60
−30.4%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 90−95
+30.6%
|
70−75
−30.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+46.2%
|
12−14
−46.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+34.7%
|
75−80
−34.7%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+27.9%
|
100−110
−27.9%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+47.8%
|
21−24
−47.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+37.5%
|
8−9
−37.5%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
+38.9%
|
18−20
−38.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+35%
|
20−22
−35%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+36.4%
|
21−24
−36.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
+35%
|
20−22
−35%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+20%
|
20−22
−20%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+38.8%
|
45−50
−38.8%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+54.5%
|
10−12
−54.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Dota 2 | 41
+20.6%
|
30−35
−20.6%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 10−12
+37.5%
|
8−9
−37.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+33.3%
|
9−10
−33.3%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+33.3%
|
9−10
−33.3%
|
This is how Pro Vega 20 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:
- Pro Vega 20 is 36% faster in 1080p
- Pro Vega 20 is 37% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro Vega 20 is 108% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Pro Vega 20 surpassed Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in all 47 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.36 | 9.26 |
| Recency | 14 November 2018 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Pro Vega 20 has a 33.5% higher aggregate performance score.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
