ATI FireGL 9600 T2-128 vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameVega 12RV350
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date14 November 2018 (6 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed815 MHz398 MHz
Boost clock speed1283 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate102.61.592
Floating-point processing power3.284 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed740 MHz297 MHz
Memory bandwidth189.4 GB/s9.504 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2018 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

Pro Vega 20 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 20 and FireGL 9600 T2-128. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation card while FireGL 9600 T2-128 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20
ATI FireGL 9600 T2-128
FireGL 9600 T2-128

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 87 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9600 T2-128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.