GeForce RTX 4080 vs Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 3 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 17.29 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Ada Lovelace |
| GPU code name | Vega 10 | AD103-300-A1 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 June 2017 (6 years ago) | 20 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,199 |
| Current price | no data | $1451 (1.2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | 9728 |
| Core clock speed | 852 MHz | 2205 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2505 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 45,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 320 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 224.0 | 761.5 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 310 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 22400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 716.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | no data | 8.9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 June 2017 | 20 September 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 320 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU and GeForce RTX 4080. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
