Radeon PRO V710 vs Pro V320 MxGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.23
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)3 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584 ×23456
Core clock speed852 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0 ×2432.0
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS ×227.65 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×296
TMUs224 ×2216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cache896 KB768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data54 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×228 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit ×2224 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s ×2504.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 158 Watt

PRO V710 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 45.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.