ATI Xbox 360 E GPU vs Radeon Pro 5700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking177not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.35no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 10Xenos Corona
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)10 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304240
Core clock speed1243 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million372 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate194.48.000
Floating-point processing power6.221 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs14416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Lengthno data264 mm
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 10 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 120 Watt

Pro 5700 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Xbox 360 E GPU, on the other hand, has 8.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and Xbox 360 E GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while Xbox 360 E GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
ATI Xbox 360 E GPU
Xbox 360 E GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Xbox 360 E GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.