Radeon Pro 555X vs Quadro P620

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 with Radeon Pro 555X, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.30
+13.1%

P620 outperforms Pro 555X by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking474511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.337.70
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Polaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)16 July 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed1177 MHz907 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate46.1843.54
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS1.393 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1275 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s81.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P620 9.30
+13.1%
Pro 555X 8.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3660
+13.1%
Pro 555X 3235

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P620 12084
Pro 555X 12693
+5%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P620 10928
Pro 555X 12993
+18.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+14.7%
30−35
−14.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Fortnite 113
+135%
45−50
−135%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+15%
20−22
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
Valorant 85−90
+7.4%
80−85
−7.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+14.7%
30−35
−14.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+10.5%
120−130
−10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Dota 2 90
+50%
60−65
−50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Fortnite 42
−14.3%
45−50
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+15%
20−22
−15%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+17.2%
27−30
−17.2%
Metro Exodus 17
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Valorant 85−90
+7.4%
80−85
−7.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+14.7%
30−35
−14.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Dota 2 83
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+15%
20−22
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Valorant 85−90
+7.4%
80−85
−7.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 29
−65.5%
45−50
+65.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+11.5%
60−65
−11.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+9.8%
40−45
−9.8%
Valorant 100−105
+12.4%
85−90
−12.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 45−50
+12.2%
40−45
−12.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Quadro P620 and Pro 555X compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is 18% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P620 is 135% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Pro 555X is 66% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is ahead in 60 tests (90%)
  • Pro 555X is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.30 8.22
Recency 1 February 2018 16 July 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P620 has a 13.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

Pro 555X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555X in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 641 vote

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 172 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P620 or Radeon Pro 555X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.