Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Pro 5600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
24.01

RX 6700 XT outperforms Pro 5600M by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking23650
Place by popularitynot in top-10095
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.17
Power efficiency33.1315.49
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 12Navi 22
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560
Core clock speed1000 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8413.0
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5600M 24.01
RX 6700 XT 51.62
+115%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9232
RX 6700 XT 19847
+115%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−120%
154
+120%
1440p35−40
−137%
83
+137%
4K21−24
−138%
50
+138%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.11
1440pno data5.77
4Kno data9.58

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−261%
159
+261%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−143%
119
+143%
Elden Ring 75−80
−131%
180
+131%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−56.8%
110−120
+56.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−180%
123
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−112%
104
+112%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−229%
342
+229%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−138%
150
+138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−81.1%
95−100
+81.1%
Valorant 95−100
−125%
210−220
+125%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−56.8%
110−120
+56.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−136%
104
+136%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−85.7%
91
+85.7%
Dota 2 80−85
−100%
166
+100%
Elden Ring 75−80
−176%
215
+176%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+23%
61
−23%
Fortnite 120−130
−70.5%
200−210
+70.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−170%
281
+170%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−94%
161
+94%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−85.7%
117
+85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−40.5%
210−220
+40.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−81.1%
95−100
+81.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−126%
170−180
+126%
Valorant 95−100
−125%
210−220
+125%
World of Tanks 250−260
−9.8%
270−280
+9.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−56.8%
110−120
+56.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−107%
91
+107%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−67.3%
82
+67.3%
Dota 2 80−85
−67.5%
139
+67.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−46.7%
110−120
+46.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−131%
240
+131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−40.5%
210−220
+40.5%
Valorant 95−100
−125%
210−220
+125%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
−155%
102
+155%
Elden Ring 40−45
−176%
116
+176%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−155%
102
+155%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−155%
55−60
+155%
World of Tanks 160−170
−106%
300−350
+106%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−75%
80−85
+75%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−170%
54
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−170%
54
+170%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−130%
150−160
+130%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−175%
173
+175%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−124%
123
+124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−189%
100−110
+189%
Valorant 60−65
−189%
180−190
+189%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−52.4%
32
+52.4%
Dota 2 40−45
−149%
102
+149%
Elden Ring 18−20
−189%
55
+189%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−149%
102
+149%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−139%
43
+139%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−142%
170−180
+142%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−147%
35−40
+147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−149%
102
+149%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−156%
60−65
+156%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−176%
55−60
+176%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24
+200%
Dota 2 40−45
−159%
106
+159%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−172%
85−90
+172%
Fortnite 30−33
−177%
80−85
+177%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−151%
93
+151%
Valorant 30−35
−229%
100−110
+229%

This is how Pro 5600M and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 120% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 137% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 138% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5600M is 23% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 261% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RX 6700 XT is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.01 51.62
Recency 15 June 2020 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 230 Watt

Pro 5600M has 360% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 115% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 6900 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.