RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon Pro 5600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking277not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.73no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 12GB203
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date15 June 2020 (5 years ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25608960
Core clock speed1000 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8374.4
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2020 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 70 Watt

Pro 5600M has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5600M and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 82 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5600M or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.