RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon Pro W5300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 14GB203
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12808960
Core clock speed1000 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate100.0374.4
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2019 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 70 Watt

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 21.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5300M and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5300M is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5300M
Radeon Pro W5300M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5300M or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.