RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
24.12

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Pro 5600M by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking213119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNavi 10no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603072
Boost clock speed1265 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate164.8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5600M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1540 MBps16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−50.8%
95−100
+50.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−42.9%
150−160
+42.9%
Hitman 3 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−47.4%
140−150
+47.4%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−48.4%
95−100
+48.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−50.8%
95−100
+50.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−42.9%
150−160
+42.9%
Hitman 3 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−47.4%
140−150
+47.4%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−48.4%
95−100
+48.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−48.1%
80−85
+48.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−42.9%
150−160
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−47.4%
140−150
+47.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−48.1%
80−85
+48.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−48.4%
95−100
+48.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−47.1%
75−80
+47.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Hitman 3 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−50%
75−80
+50%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−44.2%
75−80
+44.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−50%
60−65
+50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.12 36.49
Recency 15 June 2020 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 71 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 14 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.