UHD Graphics 630 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking287not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.03no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 12Coffee Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (5 years ago)3 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560192
Core clock speed1000 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate164.824.00
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs643
TMUs16024
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed770 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2020 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Pro 5600M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 630 Mobile, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5600M and UHD Graphics 630 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 630 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 83 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 41 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5600M or UHD Graphics 630 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.