Radeon R9 M390 vs Pro 560

Place in the ranking	484	459
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.31	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Pitcairn
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	9 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1024
Core clock speed	907 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,000 million	5000 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	58.05	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.858 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	64	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
Eyefinity	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	+
HD3D	-	+
PowerTune	-	+
DualGraphics	-	+
ZeroCore	-	+
Switchable graphics	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
Mantle	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560 9.04

R9 M390 9.91
+9.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560 5305

R9 M390 6819
+28.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 −10%	44 +10%
4K	18−20 −16.7%	21 +16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −10.3%	30−35 +10.3%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −13.6%	24−27 +13.6%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −12.5%	27−30 +12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
Valorant	30−35 −11.8%	35−40 +11.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −10.3%	30−35 +10.3%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Dota 2	30−35 +45.5%	22 −45.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −7.9%	40−45 +7.9%
Fortnite	50−55 −9.4%	55−60 +9.4%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −13.6%	24−27 +13.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −6.3%	34 +6.3%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −12.5%	27−30 +12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −8.5%	75−80 +8.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −22.2%	33 +22.2%
Valorant	30−35 −11.8%	35−40 +11.8%
World of Tanks	130−140 −7.5%	140−150 +7.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −10.3%	30−35 +10.3%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Dota 2	30−35 −12.5%	35−40 +12.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −7.9%	40−45 +7.9%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −13.6%	24−27 +13.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −8.5%	75−80 +8.5%
Valorant	30−35 −11.8%	35−40 +11.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −6.8%	45−50 +6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
World of Tanks	65−70 −9.2%	70−75 +9.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −10%	21−24 +10%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Valorant	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Dota 2	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Fortnite	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Valorant	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%

This is how Pro 560 and R9 M390 compete in popular games:

R9 M390 is 10% faster in 1080p
R9 M390 is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 560 is 45% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M390 is 33% faster.

All in all, in popular games: