Radeon RX 6400 vs Pro 555X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 555X with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

Pro 555X
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.41

RX 6400 outperforms Pro 555X by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505281
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.35
Power efficiency7.7225.78
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 21Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date16 July 2018 (6 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed907 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2321 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate43.54111.4
Floating-point processing power1.393 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1275 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 555X 8.41
RX 6400 19.85
+136%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 555X 3235
RX 6400 7631
+136%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Elden Ring 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Valorant 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Dota 2 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Elden Ring 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−122%
80−85
+122%
Fortnite 45−50
−124%
110−120
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−124%
150−160
+124%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Valorant 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
World of Tanks 120−130
−130%
290−300
+130%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Dota 2 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−122%
80−85
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−124%
150−160
+124%
Valorant 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Elden Ring 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−126%
95−100
+126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
World of Tanks 60−65
−130%
140−150
+130%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Valorant 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Elden Ring 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Fortnite 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Valorant 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.41 19.85
Recency 16 July 2018 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 53 Watt

RX 6400 has a 136% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 41.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 171 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2042 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.