Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs RTX 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 with Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000
2018
16 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
41.38
+91.4%

RTX 5000 outperforms RTX 3000 Max-Q by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking86236
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.27no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameTU104N19E-Q1 MAX-Q
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 August 2018 (5 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data
Current price$1540 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721920
Core clock speed1620 MHz600 - 870 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHz1215 - 1380 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt60 - 70 Watt
Texture fill rate348.5175.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 5000 and Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 41.38
+91.4%
RTX 3000 Max-Q 21.62

RTX 5000 outperforms RTX 3000 Max-Q by 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 5000 15981
+91.4%
RTX 3000 Max-Q 8349

RTX 5000 outperforms RTX 3000 Max-Q by 91% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+86.7%
75
−86.7%
1440p85−90
+80.9%
47
−80.9%
4K55−60
+83.3%
30
−83.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+100%
30−33
−100%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+103%
35−40
−103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65
+117%
30−33
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+94%
50−55
−94%
Hitman 3 88
+95.6%
45−50
−95.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+106%
35−40
−106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+106%
35−40
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70
+100%
35−40
−100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+108%
24−27
−108%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+103%
35−40
−103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 59
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+94%
50−55
−94%
Hitman 3 62
+107%
30−33
−107%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+106%
35−40
−106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 72
+106%
35−40
−106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+106%
35−40
−106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97
+94%
50−55
−94%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44
+110%
21−24
−110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+94%
50−55
−94%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+106%
35−40
−106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+106%
16−18
−106%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 66
+120%
30−33
−120%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+110%
21−24
−110%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Hitman 3 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+110%
21−24
−110%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 47
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Hitman 3 24
+100%
12−14
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+113%
16−18
−113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16
+100%
8−9
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+100%
6−7
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+100%
12−14
−100%

This is how RTX 5000 and RTX 3000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 is 87% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 is 81% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 is 83% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.38 21.62
Recency 13 August 2018 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 60 Watt

The Quadro RTX 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 163 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 32 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.