NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 555X

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Pro 555X
8.35

Quadro T500 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 555X by 7% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking465451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.80no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 21TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date5 June 2017 (6 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$894 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768896
Core clock speed855 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate43.5494.92

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 555X and Quadro T500 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5080 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDAno data7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−20%
36
+20%
1440p14−16
−7.1%
15
+7.1%
4K14−16
−21.4%
17
+21.4%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−50%
30
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−6.9%
30−35
+6.9%
Hitman 3 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−40%
28
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−6.9%
30−35
+6.9%
Hitman 3 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−64.7%
28
+64.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−35%
27
+35%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−6.9%
30−35
+6.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−11.8%
19
+11.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Pro 555X and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • T500 Mobile is 20% faster than Pro 555X

1440p resolution:

  • T500 Mobile is 7.1% faster than Pro 555X

4K resolution:

  • T500 Mobile is 21.4% faster than Pro 555X

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T500 Mobile is 64.7% faster than the Pro 555X.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is ahead in 54 tests (81%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (19%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 8.35 8.90
Recency 5 June 2017 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555X and Quadro T500 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 153 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 94 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.