GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon Pro 555X
Aggregated performance score
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 555X by a whopping 199% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 469 | 200 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 71 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.73 | no data |
Architecture | Polaris (2016−2019) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | Polaris 21 | GN20-P1 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 5 June 2017 (6 years ago) | 10 May 2021 (3 years ago) |
Current price | $894 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1222 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1485 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 13,250 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) |
Texture fill rate | 43.54 | 118.8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon Pro 555X and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
FreeSync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
CUDA | no data | 8.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 24−27
−213%
| 75
+213%
|
1440p | 14−16
−200%
| 42
+200%
|
4K | 8−9
−225%
| 26
+225%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−377%
|
62
+377%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
−188%
|
45−50
+188%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
−400%
|
60
+400%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−286%
|
108
+286%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−187%
|
65−70
+187%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−354%
|
59
+354%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−295%
|
79
+295%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 21−24
−282%
|
84
+282%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−186%
|
80−85
+186%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
−400%
|
105
+400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−282%
|
65
+282%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
−407%
|
76
+407%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
−428%
|
95
+428%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16
−321%
|
59
+321%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
−188%
|
45−50
+188%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
−192%
|
35
+192%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−250%
|
98
+250%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−187%
|
65−70
+187%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−246%
|
45
+246%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−270%
|
74
+270%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 21−24
−273%
|
82
+273%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−186%
|
80−85
+186%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
−324%
|
89
+324%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−229%
|
56
+229%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
−375%
|
57
+375%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
−160%
|
39
+160%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
−322%
|
76
+322%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−441%
|
92
+441%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16
−293%
|
55
+293%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
−188%
|
45−50
+188%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
−117%
|
26
+117%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−218%
|
89
+218%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−208%
|
40
+208%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−240%
|
68
+240%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 21−24
−232%
|
73
+232%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−186%
|
80−85
+186%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−194%
|
50
+194%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16
−100%
|
28
+100%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−217%
|
35−40
+217%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
−377%
|
62
+377%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−271%
|
52
+271%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
−467%
|
34
+467%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−217%
|
18−20
+217%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−12
−300%
|
44
+300%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
−286%
|
27−30
+286%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−550%
|
26
+550%
|
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−475%
|
69
+475%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−450%
|
22
+450%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−285%
|
50
+285%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
−400%
|
60
+400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−264%
|
50−55
+264%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−567%
|
20
+567%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
−217%
|
18−20
+217%
|
Hitman 3 | 8−9
−313%
|
33
+313%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−100%
|
16−18
+100%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
−950%
|
21
+950%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−225%
|
12−14
+225%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−375%
|
19
+375%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−383%
|
29
+383%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−220%
|
16−18
+220%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−660%
|
38
+660%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−900%
|
10
+900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−200%
|
21
+200%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10
−211%
|
28
+211%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−289%
|
35−40
+289%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−400%
|
10
+400%
|
This is how Pro 555X and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 213% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 200% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 225% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 950% faster than the Pro 555X.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 3050 Ti Mobile surpassed Pro 555X in all 68 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 8.36 | 24.99 |
Recency | 5 June 2017 | 10 May 2021 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm |
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555X in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.