GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs Radeon Pro 555
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 508 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 7.52 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 21 | G80 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 19 November 2007 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 112 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 681 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 28.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.306 TFLOPS | 0.2688 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 20 |
| TMUs | 48 | 28 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 640 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1275 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 June 2017 | 19 November 2007 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 640 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Pro 555 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555 and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
