Radeon Pro 580X vs GeForce 8800 GTS 112

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.15
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG80Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date19 November 2007 (17 years ago)18 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1122304
Core clock speed500 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors681 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate28.00172.8
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs2032
TMUs28144
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cache80 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount640 MB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s217.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 640 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

Pro 580X has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1180% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and Radeon Pro 580X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 580X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 309 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 92 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 or Radeon Pro 580X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.