Radeon RX 6650M vs Pro 5500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro 5500M
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
17.64

RX 6650M outperforms Pro 5500M by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking290107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.65no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (4 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$1950 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361792
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2222 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate139.2270.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5500M and Radeon RX 6650M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5500M 17.64
RX 6650M 38.62
+119%

RX 6650M outperforms Pro 5500M by 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 5500M 6819
RX 6650M 14930
+119%

RX 6650M outperforms Pro 5500M by 119% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro 5500M 14725
RX 6650M 32846
+123%

RX 6650M outperforms Pro 5500M by 123% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro 5500M 10399
RX 6650M 25739
+148%

RX 6650M outperforms Pro 5500M by 148% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−96.6%
114
+96.6%
1440p52
−112%
110−120
+112%
4K35
−114%
75−80
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−354%
127
+354%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−88.9%
65−70
+88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−123%
65−70
+123%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−116%
120−130
+116%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−279%
106
+279%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−71.7%
75−80
+71.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−98%
95−100
+98%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−102%
110−120
+102%
Hitman 3 81
−121%
179
+121%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−154%
140−150
+154%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75
−24%
90−95
+24%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−344%
222
+344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−215%
104
+215%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−88.9%
65−70
+88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−123%
65−70
+123%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−116%
120−130
+116%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−182%
79
+182%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 32
−203%
95−100
+203%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−102%
110−120
+102%
Hitman 3 40−45
−134%
95−100
+134%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−154%
140−150
+154%
Metro Exodus 64
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 61
−52.5%
90−95
+52.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
−313%
95
+313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
−146%
167
+146%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−185%
94
+185%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−88.9%
65−70
+88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−123%
65−70
+123%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35
−143%
85−90
+143%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−129%
64
+129%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−71.7%
75−80
+71.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−102%
110−120
+102%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−154%
140−150
+154%
Metro Exodus 57
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−131%
90
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−87.9%
62
+87.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 54
−72.2%
90−95
+72.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−118%
70−75
+118%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
−105%
90−95
+105%
Hitman 3 24−27
−96.2%
50−55
+96.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−138%
30−35
+138%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−121%
40−45
+121%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−187%
40−45
+187%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37
−59.5%
55−60
+59.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 40
−75%
70−75
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−138%
80−85
+138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−133%
80−85
+133%
Metro Exodus 41
−75.6%
70−75
+75.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−176%
90−95
+176%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−183%
30−35
+183%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 35−40
−69.4%
60−65
+69.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−158%
45−50
+158%
Hitman 3 12−14
−138%
30−35
+138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−158%
45−50
+158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−171%
45−50
+171%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Battlefield 5 14
−236%
45−50
+236%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23
−60.9%
35−40
+60.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−125%
50−55
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−158%
45−50
+158%
Metro Exodus 21
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16
−113%
30−35
+113%

This is how Pro 5500M and RX 6650M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is 97% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650M is 112% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650M is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6650M is 354% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.64 38.62
Recency 13 November 2019 4 January 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6650M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M
AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 248 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 72 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.