UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs Radeon Pro 5300M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
14.88
+10.1%

Pro 5300M outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking361386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.4063.79
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)no data
GPU code nameNavi 14Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate100.0no data
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
+0%
12
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+12.3%
70−75
−12.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+10.5%
55−60
−10.5%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+12.3%
70−75
−12.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+433%
9
−433%
Fortnite 80−85
+7.9%
75−80
−7.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+8.9%
55−60
−8.9%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+12.2%
40−45
−12.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+10.4%
45−50
−10.4%
Valorant 120−130
+6.2%
110−120
−6.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+10.5%
55−60
−10.5%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+12.3%
70−75
−12.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+6.6%
180−190
−6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Dota 2 90−95
+241%
27
−241%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+500%
8
−500%
Fortnite 80−85
+7.9%
75−80
−7.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+8.9%
55−60
−8.9%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+12.2%
40−45
−12.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+817%
6
−817%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+329%
7
−329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+10.4%
45−50
−10.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%
Valorant 120−130
+6.2%
110−120
−6.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+10.5%
55−60
−10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Dota 2 90−95
+268%
25
−268%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+500%
8
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+8.9%
55−60
−8.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+10.4%
45−50
−10.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%
Valorant 120−130
+6.2%
110−120
−6.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+7.9%
75−80
−7.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+10.2%
95−100
−10.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+17.7%
120−130
−17.7%
Valorant 140−150
+7.2%
130−140
−7.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+10.7%
27−30
−10.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+12.5%
30−35
−12.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+10.3%
27−30
−10.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Valorant 75−80
+11.3%
70−75
−11.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+10.6%
45−50
−10.6%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+8.7%
21−24
−8.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%

This is how Pro 5300M and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 817% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is ahead in 65 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.88 13.51
Recency 13 November 2019 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 15 Watt

Pro 5300M has a 10.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 466.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 172 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 115 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5300M or UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.