RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro 5300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
15.44

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Pro 5300M by a whopping 199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.75
Power efficiency12.6145.78
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2019 (4 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802816
Core clock speed1000 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate100.0187.4
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs8088
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300M 15.44
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.15
+199%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5300M 5959
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17810
+199%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−190%
90−95
+190%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−190%
290−300
+190%
Hitman 3 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−195%
230−240
+195%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−183%
150−160
+183%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−191%
230−240
+191%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−190%
90−95
+190%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−190%
290−300
+190%
Hitman 3 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−195%
230−240
+195%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−183%
150−160
+183%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−191%
230−240
+191%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−190%
90−95
+190%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−190%
290−300
+190%
Hitman 3 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−195%
230−240
+195%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−191%
230−240
+191%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−183%
85−90
+183%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−196%
240−250
+196%
Hitman 3 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−190%
90−95
+190%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−195%
280−290
+195%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Hitman 3 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−195%
230−240
+195%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.44 46.15
Recency 13 November 2019 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 198.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 21.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 169 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.