Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 3100 with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 3100
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.56

Arc A770 outperforms PRO WX 3100 by a whopping 410% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking572155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.9455.61
Power efficiency7.0910.45
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameLexaDG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc A770 has 1026% better value for money than PRO WX 3100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124096
Core clock speed925 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01614.4
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 3100 6.56
Arc A770 33.47
+410%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 3100 2583
Arc A770 13172
+410%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

PRO WX 3100 3691
Arc A770 41303
+1019%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

PRO WX 3100 11702
Arc A770 103295
+783%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

PRO WX 3100 2671
Arc A770 32666
+1123%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

PRO WX 3100 18522
Arc A770 139166
+651%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

PRO WX 3100 176357
Arc A770 628292
+256%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−693%
111
+693%
1440p12−14
−417%
62
+417%
4K7−8
−471%
40
+471%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.21
−380%
2.96
+380%
1440p16.58
−213%
5.31
+213%
4K28.43
−246%
8.23
+246%
  • Arc A770 has 380% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A770 has 213% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A770 has 246% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−1093%
179
+1093%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−792%
116
+792%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−500%
78
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−780%
132
+780%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−333%
110−120
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−662%
99
+662%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−438%
70
+438%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−516%
117
+516%
Fortnite 35−40
−279%
140−150
+279%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−17.9%
33
+17.9%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−827%
139
+827%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−452%
120−130
+452%
Valorant 70−75
−183%
190−200
+183%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−560%
99
+560%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−333%
110−120
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−577%
88
+577%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−165%
270−280
+165%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−369%
61
+369%
Dota 2 50−55
−400%
250−260
+400%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−474%
109
+474%
Fortnite 35−40
−279%
140−150
+279%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−10.7%
31
+10.7%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−747%
127
+747%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−357%
105
+357%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−842%
113
+842%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−452%
120−130
+452%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−1533%
196
+1533%
Valorant 70−75
−183%
190−200
+183%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−333%
110−120
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−538%
83
+538%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−346%
58
+346%
Dota 2 50−55
−400%
250−260
+400%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−447%
104
+447%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+21.7%
23
−21.7%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−452%
120−130
+452%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−929%
72
+929%
Valorant 70−75
−183%
190−200
+183%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−279%
140−150
+279%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−358%
220−230
+358%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−463%
45
+463%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1083%
71
+1083%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−361%
170−180
+361%
Valorant 70−75
−230%
230−240
+230%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−800%
45
+800%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−531%
82
+531%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
15
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−500%
60
+500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−523%
80−85
+523%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−182%
48
+182%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1725%
73
+1725%
Valorant 30−35
−500%
190−200
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−1400%
15
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1200%
26
+1200%
Dota 2 21−24
−400%
110−120
+400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−717%
49
+717%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−533%
35−40
+533%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−533%
35−40
+533%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how PRO WX 3100 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 693% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 417% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 471% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the PRO WX 3100 is 25% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 4600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • PRO WX 3100 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • Arc A770 is ahead in 57 tests (93%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.56 33.47
Recency 12 June 2017 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

PRO WX 3100 has 246.2% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 410.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 57 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5380 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 3100 or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.