Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4200 Radeon Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 8100 Radeon Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 9200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7 A770M Arc 7 A780 Arc A580 Arc A750 Arc A770 Arc A780

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
9.50

Arc A770 outperforms Pro WX 4100 by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
Arc A770 Arc A770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking474154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.6856.18
Power efficiency13.0310.42
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBaffinDG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc A770 has 1427% better value for money than Pro WX 4100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244096
Core clock speed1125 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate76.86614.4
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs64256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 4100 9.50
Arc A770 34.19
+260%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4100 3660
Arc A770 13173
+260%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−270%
111
+270%
1440p16−18
−288%
62
+288%
4K10−12
−300%
40
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.30
−349%
2.96
+349%
1440p24.94
−370%
5.31
+370%
4K39.90
−385%
8.23
+385%
  • Arc A770 has 349% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A770 has 370% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A770 has 385% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 179
+0%
179
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 132
+0%
132
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+0%
70
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 99
+0%
99
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 113
+0%
113
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+0%
196
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+0%
8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4100 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 270% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 288% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.50 34.19
Recency 10 November 2016 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 225 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has 350% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 259.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
P104-100 P104 100
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
T1000
GTX 980MX NVIDIA GTX 980MX
vs
ATI 8500 8500
GT 1030 NVIDIA GT 1030
vs
HD 6970 X2 6970 X2
GT 1030 NVIDIA GT 1030
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile 3050 A Mobile
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
FirePro S7000 S7000
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
R5 220 OEM 220 OEM
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
R5 Graphics Graphics
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
vs
GTX 950M 950M
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
GeForce 920MX 920MX
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900
vs
HD 8570A 8570A

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 48 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5381 vote

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.