GeForce RTX 4080 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 2100 with GeForce RTX 4080, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 2100
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
4.65

RTX 4080 outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 1768% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.7229.08
Power efficiency9.4919.40
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLexaAD103
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 4080 has 682% better value for money than PRO WX 2100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5129728
Core clock speed925 MHz2205 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01761.5
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS48.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs32304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm310 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 2100 4.65
RTX 4080 86.88
+1768%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 2100 1850
RTX 4080 34589
+1770%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−1867%
236
+1867%
1440p8−9
−1963%
165
+1963%
4K5−6
−2020%
106
+2020%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.42
−144%
5.08
+144%
1440p18.63
−156%
7.27
+156%
4K29.80
−163%
11.31
+163%
  • RTX 4080 has 144% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 has 156% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 has 163% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1357%
200−210
+1357%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−2210%
231
+2210%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−736%
110−120
+736%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1450%
217
+1450%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1050%
115
+1050%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−2410%
527
+2410%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2733%
250−260
+2733%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1473%
173
+1473%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−940%
150−160
+940%
Valorant 12−14
−5677%
751
+5677%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−736%
110−120
+736%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1343%
202
+1343%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−950%
105
+950%
Dota 2 16−18
−1156%
201
+1156%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−538%
153
+538%
Fortnite 27−30
−1000%
300−350
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−2338%
512
+2338%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2967%
276
+2967%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1013%
178
+1013%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1464%
172
+1464%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−424%
210−220
+424%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−940%
150−160
+940%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−988%
170−180
+988%
Valorant 12−14
−4515%
600−650
+4515%
World of Tanks 75−80
−253%
270−280
+253%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−736%
110−120
+736%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1114%
170
+1114%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−850%
95
+850%
Dota 2 16−18
−1356%
233
+1356%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−596%
160−170
+596%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−2186%
480
+2186%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2733%
250−260
+2733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−424%
210−220
+424%
Valorant 12−14
−4323%
575
+4323%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1189%
110−120
+1189%
Dota 2 4−5
−3950%
162
+3950%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−3140%
162
+3140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−465%
170−180
+465%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2225%
90−95
+2225%
World of Tanks 30−35
−1418%
500−550
+1418%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1143%
85−90
+1143%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65
+1200%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−5471%
390
+5471%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−3083%
191
+3083%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4867%
149
+4867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−2288%
191
+2288%
Valorant 12−14
−3631%
485
+3631%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−988%
185
+988%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1056%
185
+1056%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1393%
200−210
+1393%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1056%
185
+1056%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2175%
90−95
+2175%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
32
+1500%
Dota 2 16−18
−1235%
227
+1235%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2000%
100−110
+2000%
Fortnite 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4775%
195
+4775%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−5850%
119
+5850%
Valorant 4−5
−6025%
245
+6025%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 29
+0%
29
+0%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is 1867% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 is 1963% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 is 2020% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 is 6025% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is ahead in 61 test (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.65 86.88
Recency 4 June 2017 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 320 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has 814.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 1768.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4656 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.