Quadro 600 vs T1200 Mobile

Place in the ranking	271	1013
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.15
Power efficiency	14.80	2.40
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	no data	GF108
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	13 December 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	96
Core clock speed	855 MHz	640 MHz
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	10.24
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.2458 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	-	N/A
CUDA	-	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.20
+1364%

Quadro 600 1.38

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7791
+1367%

Quadro 600 531

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	59 +1375%	4−5 −1375%
1440p	34 +1600%	2−3 −1600%
4K	109 +1457%	7−8 −1457%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	44.75
1440p	no data	89.50
4K	no data	25.57

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+1500%

2−3

−1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +1367%	3−4 −1367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 +1467%	3−4 −1467%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +1525%	4−5 −1525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +1900%	2−3 −1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +1433%	3−4 −1433%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +1667%	3−4 −1667%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +1438%	8−9 −1438%
Hitman 3	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +1500%	6−7 −1500%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +1625%	4−5 −1625%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +1667%	3−4 −1667%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +1550%	4−5 −1550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +1417%	6−7 −1417%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +1367%	3−4 −1367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	28 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +1525%	4−5 −1525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +1900%	2−3 −1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +1433%	3−4 −1433%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +1667%	3−4 −1667%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +1438%	8−9 −1438%
Hitman 3	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +1500%	6−7 −1500%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +1625%	4−5 −1625%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +1667%	3−4 −1667%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	73 +1725%	4−5 −1725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +1400%	3−4 −1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +1417%	6−7 −1417%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +1367%	3−4 −1367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +1900%	2−3 −1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +1433%	3−4 −1433%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +1438%	8−9 −1438%
Hitman 3	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	63 +1475%	4−5 −1475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 +1475%	4−5 −1475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 +1750%	2−3 −1750%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+1667%

3−4

−1667%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +1800%	2−3 −1800%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +1400%	2−3 −1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	0−1
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2200%	1−2 −2200%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +1486%	7−8 −1486%
Hitman 3	21−24 +2200%	1−2 −2200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45 +1400%	3−4 −1400%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +1750%	2−3 −1750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +1467%	3−4 −1467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +2200%	1−2 −2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +1375%	8−9 −1375%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+1550%

2−3

−1550%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Hitman 3	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +1371%	7−8 −1371%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−12	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+1600%

1−2

−1600%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Quadro 600 compete in popular games:

T1200 Mobile is 1375% faster in 1080p
T1200 Mobile is 1600% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 1457% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.20	1.38
Recency	12 April 2021	13 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	40 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 1363.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 600, on the other hand, has 137.5% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Quadro 600 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.