Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon PRO W7700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7700 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

PRO W7700
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 190 Watt
51.82
+434%

PRO W7700 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 434% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking45426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.76no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022)Xe LPG
GPU code nameNavi 32Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$999 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724
Boost clock speed2600 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Wattno data
Texture fill rate499.2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon PRO W7700 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed18 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+420%
25
−420%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+400%
20−22
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+433%
30−33
−433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+400%
20−22
−400%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+400%
21−24
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+419%
27−30
−419%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+432%
45−50
−432%
Hitman 3 95−100
+428%
18−20
−428%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+412%
40−45
−412%
Metro Exodus 160−170
+433%
30−33
−433%
Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+419%
27−30
−419%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 260−270
+420%
50
−420%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+414%
35−40
−414%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+400%
20−22
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+433%
30−33
−433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+400%
20−22
−400%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+400%
21−24
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+419%
27−30
−419%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+432%
45−50
−432%
Hitman 3 95−100
+428%
18−20
−428%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+412%
40−45
−412%
Metro Exodus 160−170
+433%
30−33
−433%
Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+419%
27−30
−419%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210
+413%
39
−413%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+416%
31
−416%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+414%
35−40
−414%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+400%
20−22
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+400%
20−22
−400%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+400%
21−24
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+432%
45−50
−432%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+412%
40−45
−412%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+433%
30
−433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+431%
16
−431%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+414%
35−40
−414%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+419%
27−30
−419%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+426%
18−20
−426%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+431%
16−18
−431%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+433%
14−16
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+428%
18−20
−428%
Hitman 3 65−70
+400%
12−14
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+400%
20−22
−400%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+431%
16−18
−431%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Hitman 3 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%

This is how PRO W7700 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 420% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.82 9.70
Recency 13 November 2023 14 December 2023

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.