Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon PRO W7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7800 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB Radeon PRO W7900
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7900 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

PRO W7900
2023
48 GB GDDR6, 295 Watt
74.44
+626%

PRO W7900 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 626% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

PRO W7900 PRO W7900
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13443
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.83no data
Power efficiency17.60no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNavi 31Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 April 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61444
Core clock speed1855 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2495 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Wattno data
Texture fill rate958.1no data
Floating-point processing power61.32 TFLOPSno data
ROPs192no data
TMUs384no data
Ray Tracing Cores96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length280 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount48 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth864.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD180−190
+620%
25
−620%

Cost per frame, $

1080p22.22no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
World of Tanks 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
World of Tanks 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how PRO W7900 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 620% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 74.44 10.26
Recency 13 April 2023 14 December 2023

PRO W7900 has a 625.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO W7900 Radeon PRO W7900
vs
PRO W7800 Radeon PRO W7800
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
PRO W7900 Radeon PRO W7900
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 3060 GDDR6X GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X
vs
PRO W7800 Radeon PRO W7800
RTX 3060 GDDR6X GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X
vs
RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 3060 GDDR6X GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X
vs
Arc A530M Arc A530M
H100 CNX H100 CNX
vs
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
vs
RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU M3 Max 30-Core GPU
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 9000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
RX 7600 Radeon RX 455 OEM
vs
RX 455 OEM RX 7600
RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600
vs
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600
vs
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 77 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.