Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon PRO W7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7900 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

PRO W7900
2023
48 GB GDDR6, 295 Watt
75.58
+679%

PRO W7900 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 679% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking10426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.76no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022)Xe LPG
GPU code nameNavi 31Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 April 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data
Current price$4649 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61444
Boost clock speed2495 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Wattno data
Texture fill rate958.1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon PRO W7900 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length280 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount48 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed18 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth864.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD190−200
+660%
25
−660%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+650%
20−22
−650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+614%
14−16
−614%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+667%
30−33
−667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+650%
20−22
−650%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+673%
21−24
−673%
Far Cry New Dawn 210−220
+678%
27−30
−678%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+645%
45−50
−645%
Hitman 3 140−150
+678%
18−20
−678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−310
+632%
40−45
−632%
Metro Exodus 230−240
+667%
30−33
−667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 210−220
+678%
27−30
−678%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+600%
50
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 270−280
+671%
35−40
−671%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+650%
20−22
−650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+614%
14−16
−614%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+667%
30−33
−667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+650%
20−22
−650%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+673%
21−24
−673%
Far Cry New Dawn 210−220
+678%
27−30
−678%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+645%
45−50
−645%
Hitman 3 140−150
+678%
18−20
−678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−310
+632%
40−45
−632%
Metro Exodus 230−240
+667%
30−33
−667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 210−220
+678%
27−30
−678%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−310
+669%
39
−669%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 240−250
+674%
31
−674%
Watch Dogs: Legion 270−280
+671%
35−40
−671%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+650%
20−22
−650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+614%
14−16
−614%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+650%
20−22
−650%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+673%
21−24
−673%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+645%
45−50
−645%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−310
+632%
40−45
−632%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240
+667%
30
−667%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+650%
16
−650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 270−280
+671%
35−40
−671%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 210−220
+678%
27−30
−678%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+637%
18−20
−637%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+650%
16−18
−650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+650%
12−14
−650%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+633%
14−16
−633%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+678%
18−20
−678%
Hitman 3 100−105
+669%
12−14
−669%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+650%
20−22
−650%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+614%
14−16
−614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+650%
12−14
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+650%
16−18
−650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Hitman 3 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+650%
10−11
−650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+650%
12−14
−650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+650%
10−11
−650%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+650%
10−11
−650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%

This is how PRO W7900 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 660% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 75.58 9.70
Recency 13 April 2023 14 December 2023

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 68 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.