GeForce4 448 Go vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15491516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRS200NV18 A4
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)1 March 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2no data
Core clock speed183 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHzno data
Number of transistors30 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.370.8
ROPs22
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 8x
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.08.0
OpenGL1.41.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 340M 2
GeForce4 448 Go 5
+150%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 1−2 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 1 March 2002
Chip lithography 180 nm 150 nm

ATI IGP 340M has an age advantage of 7 months.

GeForce4 448 Go, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce4 448 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M
NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
GeForce4 448 Go

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 448 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340M or GeForce4 448 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.