Arc A550M vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Radeon-P Radeon 7000 Radeon 7000 IGP Radeon IGP 330M Radeon IGP 340M Radeon IGP 345M Radeon IGP 350M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A350M A370M A380M A530M A550M A570M A730M A770M

Contents

Share:
ATI IGP 340M IGP 340M
Arc A550M Arc A550M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1603279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.97
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRS200DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22048
Core clock speed183 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors30 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37262.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs2128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 50−55
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 50−55
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Valorant 21−24
−604%
160−170
+604%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2711%
250−260
+2711%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 50−55
Dota 2 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Valorant 21−24
−604%
160−170
+604%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 50−55
Dota 2 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Valorant 21−24
−604%
160−170
+604%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5800%
55−60
+5800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3600%
35−40
+3600%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−207%
40−45
+207%
Valorant 0−1 130−140

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 5800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A550M performs better in 24 tests (39%)
  • there's a draw in 37 tests (61%)

Pros & cons summary

Chip lithography 180 nm 6 nm

Arc A550M has a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and Arc A550M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI IGP 340M Radeon IGP 340M
vs
GTS 260M GeForce GTS 260M
Arc A550M Arc A550M
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
ATI IGP 340M Radeon IGP 340M
vs
9500M GE GeForce 9500M GE
ATI Mobility 7000 IGP ATI Radeon 7000 IGP
vs
GTX 1660 Mobile 1660 Mobile
ATI Mobility 7000 IGP ATI Radeon 7000 IGP
vs
Vega 6 Embedded 6 Embedded
ATI Mobility 7000 IGP ATI Radeon 7000 IGP
vs
Arc A570M A570M
ATI IGP 340M ATI IGP 340M
vs
RX Vega 11 Embedded Vega 11 Embedded
ATI IGP 340M ATI IGP 340M
vs
Arc A370M A370M
ATI IGP 340M ATI IGP 340M
vs
Arc A770M A770M
ATI IGP 340M ATI IGP 340M
vs
Arc A730M A730M
ATI IGP 340M ATI IGP 340M
vs
Arc A380M A380M
ATI IGP 340M ATI IGP 340M
vs
RTX 5060 5060
Castle Rock
vs
ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP IIC AGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 93 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340M or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.