GeForce RTX 5060 vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1608	71
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	100.00
Power efficiency	no data	26.34
Architecture	Rage 6 (2000−2007)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code name	RS200	GB206
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	5 October 2002 (23 years ago)	19 May 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	3840
Core clock speed	183 MHz	2280 MHz
Boost clock speed	180 MHz	2497 MHz
Number of transistors	30 million	21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	180 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	145 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.37	299.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	19.18 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	48
TMUs	2	120
Tensor Cores	no data	120
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30
L1 Cache	no data	3.8 MB
L2 Cache	no data	32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 5.0 x8
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	7.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	1.4	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.4
CUDA	-	12.0
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	156
1440p	no data	73
4K	no data	52

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.92
1440p	no data	4.10
4K	no data	5.75

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	5 October 2002	19 May 2025
Chip lithography	180 nm	5 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---