Arc A530M vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1580309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.36
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRS200DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)1 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores21536
Core clock speed183 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors30 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37124.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs296
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 340M Samples: 4 2
Arc A530M Samples: 36 7988
+399300%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%
Valorant 21−24
−530%
140−150
+530%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−2813%
230−240
+2813%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 21−24
−530%
140−150
+530%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 21−24
−530%
140−150
+530%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4700%
45−50
+4700%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Valorant 0−1 110−120

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A530M is 4700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A530M performs better in 21 tests (36%)
  • there's a draw in 37 tests (64%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 1 August 2023
Chip lithography 180 nm 6 nm

Arc A530M has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and Arc A530M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 214 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340M or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.