GeForce GT 630 OEM vs Radeon HD 8210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8210 with GeForce GT 630 OEM, including specs and performance data.

HD 8210
2014
8 Watt
0.49

GT 630 OEM outperforms HD 8210 by a whopping 241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1236942
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.202.29
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameKalindiGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 January 2014 (10 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128192
Core clock speed300 MHz875 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40014.00
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5
−220%
16−18
+220%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

This is how HD 8210 and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:

  • GT 630 OEM is 220% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 1.67
Recency 31 January 2014 24 April 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 50 Watt

HD 8210 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 525% lower power consumption.

GT 630 OEM, on the other hand, has a 240.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GT 630 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8210 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8210
Radeon HD 8210
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 98 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.