Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 7970M Crossfire outperforms Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 341 | 403 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.53 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN (2012−2015) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Wimbledon XT | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 May 2012 (12 years ago) | April 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1366 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1442 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 3 MB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 84 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Multi-Projection | no data | + |
| Multi Monitor | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 132
+32%
| 100−110
−32%
|
| Full HD | 101
+34.7%
| 75−80
−34.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+33.3%
|
24−27
−33.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+30%
|
40−45
−30%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+33.3%
|
24−27
−33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+32%
|
50−55
−32%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+43.3%
|
30−33
−43.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+46.7%
|
30−33
−46.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
+30%
|
30−33
−30%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+30%
|
50−55
−30%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+30%
|
40−45
−30%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+33.3%
|
24−27
−33.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 55−60
+45%
|
40−45
−45%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+42.5%
|
40−45
−42.5%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+36.9%
|
65−70
−36.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+32%
|
50−55
−32%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+43.3%
|
30−33
−43.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+42.5%
|
40−45
−42.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+46.7%
|
30−33
−46.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+34.1%
|
85−90
−34.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
+30%
|
30−33
−30%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+40%
|
35−40
−40%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+30%
|
50−55
−30%
|
| World of Tanks | 200−210
+35.3%
|
150−160
−35.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+30%
|
40−45
−30%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+33.3%
|
24−27
−33.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 55−60
+45%
|
40−45
−45%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+42.5%
|
40−45
−42.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+32%
|
50−55
−32%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+43.3%
|
30−33
−43.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+34.1%
|
85−90
−34.1%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+30%
|
50−55
−30%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 24−27
+33.3%
|
18−20
−33.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+38.9%
|
18−20
−38.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+38.2%
|
110−120
−38.2%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+40%
|
10−11
−40%
|
| World of Tanks | 110−120
+30.6%
|
85−90
−30.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+37.5%
|
24−27
−37.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+33.3%
|
9−10
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+33.3%
|
30−33
−33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+33.3%
|
30−33
−33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+38.9%
|
18−20
−38.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+33.3%
|
27−30
−33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+33.3%
|
30−33
−33.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+37.5%
|
8−9
−37.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+37.1%
|
35−40
−37.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+42.9%
|
14−16
−42.9%
|
| Fortnite | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+43.8%
|
16−18
−43.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
| Valorant | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
This is how HD 7970M Crossfire and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:
- HD 7970M Crossfire is 32% faster in 900p
- HD 7970M Crossfire is 35% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.85 | 12.29 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
HD 7970M Crossfire has a 29% higher aggregate performance score.
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
