Radeon RX 590 vs HD 7970

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970 and Radeon RX 590, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7970
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
11.74

RX 590 outperforms HD 7970 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking390241
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.1221.97
Power efficiency3.739.53
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiPolaris 30
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date22 December 2011 (13 years ago)15 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 $279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 590 has 936% better value for money than HD 7970.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482304
Core clock speedno data1469 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate118.4222.5
Floating-point processing power3.789 TFLOPS7.119 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs128144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length274 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7970 11.74
RX 590 20.97
+78.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7970 5248
RX 590 9375
+78.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7970 7770
RX 590 23363
+201%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7970 24757
RX 590 48454
+95.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7970 6862
RX 590 16814
+145%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7970 43795
RX 590 86825
+98.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p105
−71.4%
180−190
+71.4%
Full HD93
−9.7%
102
+9.7%
1440p30−35
−100%
60
+100%
4K21−24
−81%
38
+81%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.90
−116%
2.74
+116%
1440p18.30
−294%
4.65
+294%
4K26.14
−256%
7.34
+256%
  • RX 590 has 116% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 590 has 294% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 590 has 256% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−93.8%
60−65
+93.8%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−85.9%
130−140
+85.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−93.8%
60−65
+93.8%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−138%
133
+138%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−85.9%
130−140
+85.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−97.7%
85
+97.7%
Fortnite 70−75
−87.8%
139
+87.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−122%
120
+122%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−82.5%
70−75
+82.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−161%
120
+161%
Valorant 110−120
−174%
301
+174%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−93.8%
60−65
+93.8%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−98.2%
111
+98.2%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−85.9%
130−140
+85.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 212
−18.4%
250−260
+18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%
Dota 2 80−85
−41.7%
110−120
+41.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−83.7%
79
+83.7%
Fortnite 70−75
−86.5%
138
+86.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−109%
113
+109%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−82.5%
70−75
+82.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−61.2%
79
+61.2%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−100%
52
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−135%
108
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−159%
88
+159%
Valorant 110−120
−161%
287
+161%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−78.6%
100
+78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%
Dota 2 80−85
−41.7%
110−120
+41.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−72.1%
74
+72.1%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−68.5%
91
+68.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−80.4%
83
+80.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−50%
51
+50%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−29.7%
96
+29.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−68.8%
160−170
+68.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−105%
40−45
+105%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−107%
31
+107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−61.1%
170−180
+61.1%
Valorant 130−140
−70.6%
232
+70.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−82.9%
60−65
+82.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−85.7%
50−55
+85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−90.3%
55−60
+90.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−90%
35−40
+90%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−92.9%
50−55
+92.9%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−70.8%
41
+70.8%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−111%
19
+111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−88.2%
32
+88.2%
Valorant 65−70
−63.8%
113
+63.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−122%
40
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Dota 2 45−50
−65.2%
75−80
+65.2%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−84.6%
24
+84.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−109%
46
+109%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−192%
35
+192%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−142%
29
+142%

This is how HD 7970 and RX 590 compete in popular games:

  • RX 590 is 71% faster in 900p
  • RX 590 is 10% faster in 1080p
  • RX 590 is 100% faster in 1440p
  • RX 590 is 81% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 590 is 192% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 590 is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.74 20.97
Recency 22 December 2011 15 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 175 Watt

RX 590 has a 78.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7970 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970
Radeon HD 7970
AMD Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 310 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2615 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7970 or Radeon RX 590, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.