UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon HD 7870

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7870 with UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), including specs and performance data.

HD 7870
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
12.02
+283%

HD 7870 outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking408755
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.96no data
Power efficiency4.738.65
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code namePitcairnIce Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 March 2012 (12 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128032
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate80.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.56 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870 12.02
+283%
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 3.14

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7870 6194
+191%
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 2127

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7870 21348
+144%
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 8750

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
+300%
21−24
−300%
Full HD66
+408%
13
−408%
4K30−35
+233%
9
−233%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.29no data
4K11.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Elden Ring 35−40
+500%
6
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+300%
12
−300%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+313%
8
−313%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+417%
6
−417%
Valorant 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Dota 2 40−45
+258%
12
−258%
Elden Ring 35−40
+500%
6−7
−500%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+262%
13
−262%
Fortnite 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+336%
11
−336%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+514%
7
−514%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+181%
32
−181%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+182%
10−12
−182%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+227%
10−12
−227%
Valorant 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
World of Tanks 160−170
+453%
30
−453%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Dota 2 40−45
+115%
20
−115%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+292%
12
−292%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+269%
13
−269%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%
Valorant 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Elden Ring 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+214%
21−24
−214%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
World of Tanks 85−90
+286%
21−24
−286%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Valorant 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Elden Ring 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 21−24
+144%
9
−144%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Fortnite 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
Valorant 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%

This is how HD 7870 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • HD 7870 is 300% faster in 900p
  • HD 7870 is 408% faster in 1080p
  • HD 7870 is 233% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7870 is 2700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 7870 surpassed UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.02 3.14
Recency 5 March 2012 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 12 Watt

HD 7870 has a 282.8% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1358.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7870 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7870 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 644 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 371 vote

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.