UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon HD 7750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7750 with UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), including specs and performance data.

HD 7750
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
4.41
+45.1%

HD 7750 outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking628732
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.65no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameCape VerdeIce Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date15 February 2012 (12 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data
Current price$108 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51232
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate25.60no data
Floating-point performance819.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7750 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1125 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7750 4.41
+45.1%
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 3.04

Radeon HD 7750 outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7750 2240
+47.3%
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 1521

Radeon HD 7750 outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by 47% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
+28.6%
14
−28.6%
4K12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8
−25%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Hitman 3 8−9
+33.3%
6
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Hitman 3 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+27.3%
11
−27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+40%
10
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+38.5%
13
−38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how HD 7750 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • HD 7750 is 29% faster in 1080p
  • HD 7750 is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.41 3.04
Recency 15 February 2012 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 12 Watt

The Radeon HD 7750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7750 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 489 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 354 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.