HD 7670A vs R7 M350

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	717	713
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2017)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Meso	Turks
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	5 May 2015 (8 years old)	5 January 2012 (11 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	480
Compute units	6	no data
Core clock speed	725 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	825 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,550 million	716 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.36	14.40
Floating-point performance	779.5 gflops	576.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Width	no data	MXM Module

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16 GB/s	64 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.0	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.2
Vulkan	no data	N/A
Mantle	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7670A outperforms R7 M350 by 2% in our combined benchmark results.

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance score	2.62	2.67
Recency	5 May 2015	5 January 2012
Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	480
Memory bandwidth	16	64
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	45 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---