Radeon RX 5700M vs HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and Radeon RX 5700M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
1.48

RX 5700M outperforms HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking997731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.60
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 March 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7362304
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1720 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data180 Watt
Texture fill rateno data247.7
Floating-point processing powerno data7.926 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−146%
140−150
+146%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Fortnite 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Valorant 35−40
−51.4%
50−55
+51.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−109%
65−70
+109%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Dota 2 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Fortnite 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 35−40
−51.4%
50−55
+51.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Dota 2 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 35−40
−51.4%
50−55
+51.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−107%
30−35
+107%
Valorant 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Valorant 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Sons of the Forest 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Sons of the Forest 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Sons of the Forest 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and RX 5700M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700M is 146% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5700M is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700M is ahead in 44 tests (77%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 3.77
Recency 15 May 2012 1 March 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm

RX 5700M has a 154.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 32 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7640G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics or Radeon RX 5700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.