GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
1.50
+2%

HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms GTX 660M Mac Edition by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9961001
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.24
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores736384
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data30.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and GTX 660M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 4% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.50 1.47
Recency 15 May 2012 1 April 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics has a 2% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 660M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7640G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics or GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.