NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7600G 7610M 7620G 7640G 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7650A 7650M 7660G 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7670M 7690M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K120Q K140Q K160Q K180Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics with NVS 510, including specs and performance data.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
2012
1.43

NVS 510 outperforms HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
NVS 510 NVS 510

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1009984
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiencyno data3.55
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)23 October 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores656192
Core clock speed655 / 450 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.75
Floating-point processing powerno data0.306 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data12.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics and NVS 510 compete in popular games:

  • NVS 510 is 3% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.43 1.54
Recency 15 May 2012 23 October 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

NVS 510 has a 7.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics and NVS 510.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while NVS 510 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA NVS 510
NVS 510
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
vs
HD 7610M Radeon HD 7610M
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
FireStream 9170 FireStream 9170
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
vs
GTS 360M GeForce GTS 360M
HD 8510G AMD HD 8510G
vs
UHD Graphics 600 600
HD 8550G AMD HD 8550G
vs
FX 5200 5200
GT 625M NVIDIA GT 625M
vs
HD 8550M 8550M
GT 620M NVIDIA GT 620M
vs
GeForce 810M 810M
GT 525M NVIDIA GT 525M
vs
Radeon 740M 740M
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics AMD HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
vs
RTX 5090 D 5090 D
HD 7610M AMD HD 7610M
vs
RX 6500M 6500M
HD Graphics 4400 Intel Graphics 4400
vs
ATI Mobility 9700 SE 9700 SE
HD Graphics 4400 Intel Graphics 4400
vs
RTX A2000 A2000
HD Graphics 510 Intel Graphics 510
vs
RX 6800 6800

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7640G HD 7610M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 69 votes

Rate NVS 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics or NVS 510, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.